Posts by Justitia Themis

  • free2beme
    25

    Hillary Clinton

    by free2beme in
    1. jw
    2. friends

    has anyone else noticed that since the swing stopped favoring hc that the pictures of her one online news websites have shown an angry woman?.

    obama is being shown as a leader.

    mccain is shown as a leader too.

    1. Justitia Themis
    2. sammielee24
    3. gabriella
  • Justitia Themis
    Justitia Themis

    I wonder if Obama will be able to be a two-term president. If he is elected, I have my doubts that he actually intends to do most of the things of which he promises. Economically, he can not end the war on Iraq on day one, and I am sure his handlers are aware of this. If anything he will do something like Hillary's plan.

    My point of concern is the unrealistic expectation of change he engenders. When it doesn't materialize, I fear the backlash will be equally enormous.

    Again, I agree with Homerovah. The US is NOT ready for a female president; however, Hillary has earned her place in the history books, and her campaign paves the path for a female in the next 10-15 years.

  • free2beme
    25

    Hillary Clinton

    by free2beme in
    1. jw
    2. friends

    has anyone else noticed that since the swing stopped favoring hc that the pictures of her one online news websites have shown an angry woman?.

    obama is being shown as a leader.

    mccain is shown as a leader too.

    1. Justitia Themis
    2. sammielee24
    3. gabriella
  • Justitia Themis
    Justitia Themis

    I agree that, regardless of her desire, she does represent the womens' rights movement. When I heard Obama speak at the national convention shortly after he was elected Senator (just a few years ago, btw), I told my workmates the next day that he would be the first black president of the US. Interestingly, the most vocal person to disagree with me was a black male attorney. He asked me why I thought Obama would be elected before Hillary. I told him that I thought presidential politics would mimic the equal rights movement.

    This is simplifying the matter greatly, but with the advent of equal rights, black men came into corporate america and identified with white men; they did not generally assist white women, who were there social counterparts. In short, men tend to side with men of whatever color over a woman.

    I told the attorney whith whom I was speaking that I thought blacks would abandon Hillary, the wife of the 'first black president' (Bill) and a life-long civil rights activist, and would vote race, and that white men would side with a male candidate of ANY color over a female candidate. I said that white women would not be enough to get Hillary the presidency. Additionally, I opined, and he agreed with me on this point, that American wiould respond to an "orator." It's McDonald's politics: quick, easy and empty. However, he vehemently disagreed with me that a black man would be elected before a white woman, but that is how it seems to be playing. BTW, last Thursday, Obama held a telephone conference with some members of the Washington State Trial Lawyers Association. He placed Roberts on the V.P. short list; it appears Roberts' is holding his endorsement hostage for a seat at the table.

    After winning the support of close to half the Democratic party, I suspect Hillary will be sidelined completely. America has already given its opinion of Roberts, but I don't think that will matter much. The positive side of her running is that America's response to her campaign will be studied. Valid questions are being raised and discussed as to how we view and treat female candidates versus male candidates.